Victoria, B.C.: The Anti-Tourist City

30 07 2010

Residents of any place have often been notorious for being a bit anti-tourist.  Anyone who has ever lived anywhere for a certain number of years has at one time or another scoffed at tourists taking pictures of the most random sights.  Yet, as much as we hate to admit it, tourists are a big part of a successful city.  Infrastructure, attractions and museums need to be present to support these people. As well, cities may end up with certain characteristics that outsiders may often identify it with.  For better or for worse, Los Angeles is a city of movie stars, London is very proper and full of castles, and Rio de Janeiro is an all day/all night party. Do these characteristics tell the whole story or even a bit of a story?  Not likely but they do often help lure the tourist dollars into the city.

Victoria, British Columbia is a strange case.  Located on Vancouver Island in Western Canada, Victoria has been tagged as a little piece of Britain in Canada.  And I can tell you from being there that the locals hate it.  And even from an outsider’s perspective, I can see why.  It is continuously used as a representation of the city when in fact many of the ‘Britishness’ of the city is for the tourists only.

What’s more is that Victoria has been closing various attractions to the delight of the locals.  Several attractions have closed in the last decade, most prominently, the Crystal Garden, an indoor garden featuring a large number of birds.  More recently, the Royal London Wax Museum has opted to move away from Victoria due to the inability to secure a long term lease on their current address.  And how do the locals feel about all of this?  They are strangely happy about it.  While the wax museum may not be high on class, it does offer a destination for the entire family.  The next attraction under siege in the Undersea Gardens, Victoria’s own aquarium.  Although undersized, it once again provides a welcome attraction for touring families.

Victoria is a beautiful destination with a large number of fantastic sights.  Yet, a city needs to support a variety of tourist needs.  Sometimes, locals of tourist destinations need to understand that tourism and tourists help the city give it another dimension.  So go out there and hug a tourist.  And remember, your city is the world’s to share.   So support whatever wrong notion others may have about your city.





Cleveland: 10 Percent Population Loss in the 2000′s

15 07 2010

People have probably heard Cleveland’s rather humorous slogan when advertising the city (“At we’re not Detroit”), yet there has been nothing funny about Cleveland’s population over the past decade.  A blog post from 2009 on the Cleveland.com blog sums up the sentiments of the city pretty easily in the first paragraph:

Some cities will be toasting the decennial census next year, celebrating population gains and a bright future. But it’s likely there will be no champagne corks popping in Cleveland City Hall. The city is losing people at an alarming, trend-setting pace.

In the past decade, Cleveland has lost 10 percent of it’s population.  Once one of United States more prosperous city’s, Cleveland has been a gross reminder of what the past decades has done to former manufacturing centres and while cities such as Chicago and Philadelphia record population increases in the last few years, Cleveland has yet to get off the ground.

Unfortunately, there are a number of factors working against the city: a high crime rate, a cold climate and very few job opportunities.  This doesn’t bode well for the next decade and along with other rust belt cities such as Buffalo, Toledo and Detroit, it will be interesting to see if Cleveland can re-establish itself.  Pittsburgh has.  Will Cleveland be next?





Highlight in Urban Planning: Vancouver’s Canada Line

9 07 2010

Photo courtesy of Flickr user S. Yume

I recently took a small trip over to Vancouver for the Canada long weekend.  Vancouver has always come across as a cleaner, fresher city in comparison to my current hometown of Toronto although it does have a horrendous homelessness issue.   Anyways, after I landed in Vancouver, I quickly found out that one could simply take a subway to the center of the city.  This certainly isn’t anything new, but what I did find quite fascinating was just how recent the subway line, better known as the Canada Line was put into place.  It opened in 2009, 15 weeks ahead of schedule.

I find it quite remarkable that in this day in age, a city is still able to successfully build and financially support such a giant development and even finish it ahead of schedule when most major projects fall short by months or even years.  This also truly hits home since Toronto lacks any high speed public transport to the airport and it looks like it may never happen as it apparently is too costly.  But one has to wonder why when a city like Vancouver is able to succeed at building the same thing.  I took a look at Wikipedia for some financial information on the subway line and it was apparently paid for by a private-public partnership.  The total cost was approximately $2.054 billion and the main sources of funding were the Canadian Government ($450 million), Government of British Columbia ($435 million) and the Vancouver Airport Authority ($300 million).

While one has to wonder how much of a role the 2010 Olympics played into making this project a reality, I will note that the Wikipedia article also specified that the project had been in the works since the early 90′s, long before Vancouver had been announced as the host of the 2010 Olympics.  While the Canada Line project was a massive disruption for the city as many roads were torn up, it still was considered a justifiable risk since it completed the important link between downtown Vancouver and the Vancouver airport.  Maybe other cities should wake up and stop using the cost as an excuse.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.